Skip to main content

IoT Home Automation | (1) Initial Overview

After playing a while with different IoT devices, I decided that it is a perfect moment to start to do some automation inside the house. Nothing special or fancy, just small things that improve the quality of life and force me to work on some hardware devices also.

What I want to achieve?
There are three different system that I want to connect and to be able to remote control and automate.
Garage doors and gates – I want to be able from my mobile phone to open or close the gates. In this moment, I have a remote control that control them. However, in the future I do not want to use them anymore, I want to replace them with only one device – my phone.
Alarm control – Usually when you close or open the gates you also need to arm or disarm the house alarm. Why not integrate this inside one system that would be able to open the gates and disarm the alarm automatically.
Automatically water system – Even if we love plants and flowers, it is a nightmare in the morning to water 20 minutes all the flowers that are outside the house. We have an automatically system for the grass, that could be connected to flower dipper, but I would be limited to only one zone. Additional to this I want to have multiple zones, based on the flower location and how much sun receive.
From functionality perspective, this are the based ideas that I want to develop and implement. In this moment I have an package ordered from Aliexpress with ESP8266 modules and some relays for them. Until then I have an ESP8266 and a relay borrowed from one of my co-worker.


High-level system overview
All the hardware components will be connected using relays and ESP8266 controllers to the internal network. Because ESP8266 was a WiFi integrated and has support for HTTP(S) stack, all controllers will check the internal gateway for new commands. Each ESP8266 will have a smart lock system. In the case of losing the connection with the Gateway we will go to the initial state (lock doors, stop water).
The Gateway role will be played by a Raspberry PI 3. This will be the main brain of the system, that can automatically lock doors or stop the water in the case of a failure. The Gateway will be able to talk with a Azure to pull new commands or send notifications. I didn't decide yet if I will go with Azure IoT Hub for this of with Service Bus. In this moment I might go with a simple approach using Azure Service Bus Topic.
On top of this a Web App will be hosted that will expose an interface and an API that will be used to control the system.

Security
Inside the private network the most common security measurement will be used. The public web app will use Azure AD multi-factor authentication. This topic will not covered in details, because I want to protect my system, but we can have one to one discussion if you want.

Next step
Review the current gate doors hardware system and see what are the extension/integration points.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Windows Docker Containers can make WIN32 API calls, use COM and ASP.NET WebForms

After the last post , I received two interesting questions related to Docker and Windows. People were interested if we do Win32 API calls from a Docker container and if there is support for COM. WIN32 Support To test calls to WIN32 API, let’s try to populate SYSTEM_INFO class. [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct SYSTEM_INFO { public uint dwOemId; public uint dwPageSize; public uint lpMinimumApplicationAddress; public uint lpMaximumApplicationAddress; public uint dwActiveProcessorMask; public uint dwNumberOfProcessors; public uint dwProcessorType; public uint dwAllocationGranularity; public uint dwProcessorLevel; public uint dwProcessorRevision; } ... [DllImport("kernel32")] static extern void GetSystemInfo(ref SYSTEM_INFO pSI); ... SYSTEM_INFO pSI = new SYSTEM_INFO(

Azure AD and AWS Cognito side-by-side

In the last few weeks, I was involved in multiple opportunities on Microsoft Azure and Amazon, where we had to analyse AWS Cognito, Azure AD and other solutions that are available on the market. I decided to consolidate in one post all features and differences that I identified for both of them that we should need to take into account. Take into account that Azure AD is an identity and access management services well integrated with Microsoft stack. In comparison, AWS Cognito is just a user sign-up, sign-in and access control and nothing more. The focus is not on the main features, is more on small things that can make a difference when you want to decide where we want to store and manage our users.  This information might be useful in the future when we need to decide where we want to keep and manage our users.  Feature Azure AD (B2C, B2C) AWS Cognito Access token lifetime Default 1h – the value is configurable 1h – cannot be modified

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see